Every quoting software promises to fix this. None of them know how your shop actually works. That's the problem.
"I could easily spend 40 hrs/week quoting. A lot of RFQ's getting neglected over here."
Shop owner, $2M/yr revenue // Practical Machinist
"Every shop thinks a bit different in quoting. Straightforward and simple to use for one is crippled and worthless to another."
CarbideBob // Practical Machinist
"Our engineer has been quoting in Quattro Pro and Excel for 20 plus years. His spreadsheet requires a lot of experience... He is going to retire one day."
Shop owner // r/manufacturing
"We have more opportunities than we have time to quote."
Owner, 22-machine production shop // Practical Machinist, Jan 2026
"Nobody is happy with any of the available solutions."
CNC Cookbook survey of 100 shops
What if your quoting system was built around how you already think?
This is the direction, not a finished product. The right version comes from understanding how your shop actually works.
Send me your toughest RFQ.
I'll sketch out how your quoting logic could work as a system. Free, no strings. If it's useful, we talk about building it. If not, you got a free analysis of your quoting process.
Or if you'd rather just talk: Book a 20-minute conversation
I'm a tech consultant based in Germany. I'm not a machinist. I build systems.
I've spent months reading every Practical Machinist thread about quoting, studying why Paperless Parts disappoints, and analyzing why Costimator doesn't work. The pattern is always the same: every shop is different, and software that ignores that is useless.
I want to build something better. Custom quoting systems that match how each shop actually thinks. But the right version comes from talking to people who live this every day. That's why I'd like to hear from you.
Christo Wilken